Recital 86

Recital 86

General Data Protection Regulation · UE 2016/679

(86)

The controller should communicate to the data subject a personal data breach, without undue delay, where that personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of the natural person in order to allow him or her to take the necessary precautions. The communication should describe the nature of the personal data breach as well as recommendations for the natural person concerned to mitigate potential adverse effects. Such communications to data subjects should be made as soon as reasonably feasible and in close cooperation with the supervisory authority, respecting guidance provided by it or by other relevant authorities such as law-enforcement authorities. For example, the need to mitigate an immediate risk of damage would call for prompt communication with data subjects whereas the need to implement appropriate measures against continuing or similar personal data breaches may justify more time for communication.

Luxembourg specificity
loi du 1er août 2018 portant organisation de la Commission nationale pour la protection des données

In Luxembourg, communication to data subjects takes place under the supervision of the CNPD (never APDL), which publishes sector guidance through its annual deliberations. The law of 1 August 2018 organising the CNPD specifies the authority's powers, including the power to order the controller to communicate the breach to data subjects if it has underestimated the risk (Art. 34(4) GDPR).

Luxgap practice: keep a written trace of every exchange with the CNPD during breach handling (email, call minutes), as this is the only way to justify a potential communication delay in line with Recital 86.