Recital 67
Digital Operational Resilience Act · UE 2022/2554
| (67) | To address the systemic impact of ICT third-party concentration risk, this Regulation promotes a balanced solution by means of taking a flexible and gradual approach to such concentration risk since the imposition of any rigid caps or strict limitations might hinder the conduct of business and restrain the contractual freedom. Financial entities should thoroughly assess their envisaged contractual arrangements to identify the likelihood of such risk emerging, including by means of in-depth analyses of subcontracting arrangements, in particular when concluded with ICT third-party service providers established in a third country. At this stage, and with a view to striking a fair balance between the imperative of preserving contractual freedom and that of guaranteeing financial stability, it is not considered appropriate to set out rules on strict caps and limits to ICT third-party exposures. In the context of the Oversight Framework, a Lead Overseer, appointed pursuant to this Regulation, should, in respect to critical ICT third-party service providers, pay particular attention to fully grasp the magnitude of interdependences, discover specific instances where a high degree of concentration of critical ICT third-party service providers in the Union is likely to put a strain on the Union financial system’s stability and integrity and maintain a dialogue with critical ICT third-party service providers where that specific risk is identified. |
In Luxembourg, the CSSF is the competent authority for DORA supervision of financial entities, and CSSF circular 22/806 on ICT outsourcing (revised to align with DORA) details expectations on concentration analysis before any outsourcing arrangement covering a critical or important function. The Luxembourg financial centre shows a strong structural concentration on a few local hosters (eBRC, LuxConnect, POST) and two hyperscalers (AWS, Azure), which makes the concentration analysis exercise even more sensitive.
Luxgap practice: prepare your register of information in the ESAs ITS format and keep available for the CSSF a specific file on critical functions hosted at the same provider or in the same cloud region, with a testable exit plan within 12 months.