Recital 5

Recital 5

Digital Operational Resilience Act · UE 2022/2554

(5)

Despite Union and national targeted policy and legislative initiatives, ICT risk continues to pose a challenge to the operational resilience, performance and stability of the Union financial system. The reforms that followed the 2008 financial crisis primarily strengthened the financial resilience of the Union financial sector and aimed to safeguard the competitiveness and stability of the Union from economic, prudential and market conduct perspectives. Although ICT security and digital resilience are part of operational risk, they have been less in the focus of the post-financial crisis regulatory agenda and have developed in only some areas of the Union’s financial services policy and regulatory landscape, or in only a few Member States.

Luxembourg specificity
circulaire CSSF 20/750 du 14 decembre 2020 relative aux exigences en matiere de gouvernance et de gestion des risques en matiere de TIC et de securite

In Luxembourg, the CSSF anticipated DORA through CSSF circular 20/750 (requirements on ICT and security risk governance and management), which transposed the EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management. CSSF-supervised entities (banks, PFS, fund managers, payment institutions, EMIs) already compliant with 20/750 have a solid foundation, but the CSSF clearly indicated in its 2024 communications that DORA goes further: ICT third-party provider register in the ESAs format, TLPT for significant entities, and major incident notification within 4 hours using the harmonised template.

Luxgap practice: start your DORA gap assessment explicitly from your documented 20/750 compliance, and identify the 6 to 8 DORA-specific workstreams (third-party ICT register, TLPT, harmonised notification, advanced resilience testing) that constitute the real delta to fund.