Recital 39
Directive on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law · UE 2019/1937
| (39) | Protection should also extend to categories of natural persons, who, whilst not being ‘workers’ within the meaning of Article 45(1) TFEU, can play a key role in exposing breaches of Union law and may find themselves in a position of economic vulnerability in the context of their work-related activities. For instance, as regards product safety, suppliers are much closer to the source of information about possible unfair and illicit manufacturing, import or distribution practices concerning unsafe products; and as regards the implementation of Union funds, consultants providing their services are in a privileged position to draw attention to breaches they witness. Such categories of persons, which include self-employed persons providing services, freelance workers, contractors, subcontractors and suppliers, are typically subject to retaliation, which can take the form, for instance, of early termination or cancellation of a contract for services, a licence or permit, loss of business, loss of income, coercion, intimidation or harassment, blacklisting or business boycotting or damage to their reputation. Shareholders and persons in managerial bodies can also suffer retaliation, for instance in financial terms or in the form of intimidation or harassment, blacklisting or damage to their reputation. Protection should also be granted to persons whose work-based relationship has ended, and to candidates for employment or persons seeking to provide services to an organisation, who acquire information on breaches during the recruitment process or another pre-contractual negotiation stage, and who could suffer retaliation, for instance in the form of negative employment references, blacklisting or business boycotting. |
In Luxembourg, the Law of 16 May 2023 on the protection of whistleblowers fully transposes recital 39 in its Article 4, explicitly listing protected categories: self-employed, shareholders, members of administrative, management or supervisory bodies, volunteers, paid or unpaid trainees, job candidates, and persons whose work relationship has ended. OFRS and ITM check the effective openness of the channel to these categories in retaliation cases, with criminal fines of 1,250 to 25,000 EUR (doubled in case of recidivism) for obstruction.
Luxgap practice: audit your internal channel by simulating an external report, without a badge or internal email, and retain the cryptographic proof of that accessibility for each relevant date.