EU frameworkGDPRNIS 2DORAAI ActWhistleblowing
Recital 92

Recital 92

Artificial Intelligence Act · UE 2024/1689

(92)

This Regulation is without prejudice to obligations for employers to inform or to inform and consult workers or their representatives under Union or national law and practice, including Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (39), on decisions to put into service or use AI systems. It remains necessary to ensure information of workers and their representatives on the planned deployment of high-risk AI systems at the workplace where the conditions for those information or information and consultation obligations in other legal instruments are not fulfilled. Moreover, such information right is ancillary and necessary to the objective of protecting fundamental rights that underlies this Regulation. Therefore, an information requirement to that effect should be laid down in this Regulation, without affecting any existing rights of workers.

Luxembourg specificity
Code du travail luxembourgeois, articles L.261-1, L.414-3 et L.414-9

In Luxembourg, information and consultation of the staff delegation are governed by Articles L.414-3 and L.414-9 of the Labour Code, and workplace surveillance by Article L.261-1, which requires prior information and, for certain devices, a CNPD authorisation under GDPR. Recital 92 of the AI Act stacks on top of these rules: even where the headcount threshold for a staff delegation is not met, direct information of workers remains due.

Luxgap practice: for every go-live of an HR AI system, we document the dual track delegation + workers in a bilingual FR/EN minutes file enforceable before the ITM and the CNPD, and we check stacking with Article 88 GDPR.