Laws › AI Act
UE 2024/1689

Artificial Intelligence Act

The first comprehensive global framework on artificial intelligence.

Official source : EUR-Lex CELEX:32024R1689 ↗

180recitals
0with Luxgap guidance
24havg response time
Rec. 1
The purpose of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the...
Rec. 2
This Regulation should be applied in accordance with the values of...
Rec. 3
AI systems can be easily deployed in a large variety of sectors of...
Rec. 4
AI is a fast evolving family of technologies that contributes to a...
Rec. 5
At the same time, depending on the circumstances regarding its...
Rec. 6
Given the major impact that AI can have on society and the need to...
Rec. 7
In order to ensure a consistent and high level of protection of...
Rec. 8
A Union legal framework laying down harmonised rules on AI is...
Rec. 9
Harmonised rules applicable to the placing on the market, the putting...
Rec. 10
The fundamental right to the protection of personal data is...
Rec. 11
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the provisions...
Rec. 12
The notion of ‘AI system’ in this Regulation should be clearly...
Rec. 13
The notion of ‘deployer’ referred to in this Regulation should be...
Rec. 14
The notion of ‘biometric data’ used in this Regulation should be...
Rec. 15
The notion of ‘biometric identification’ referred to in this...
Rec. 16
The notion of ‘biometric categorisation’ referred to in this...
Rec. 17
The notion of ‘remote biometric identification system’ referred to in...
Rec. 18
The notion of ‘emotion recognition system’ referred to in this...
Rec. 19
For the purposes of this Regulation the notion of ‘publicly...
Rec. 20
In order to obtain the greatest benefits from AI systems while...
Rec. 21
In order to ensure a level playing field and an effective protection...
Rec. 22
In light of their digital nature, certain AI systems should fall...
Rec. 23
This Regulation should also apply to Union institutions, bodies,...
Rec. 24
If, and insofar as, AI systems are placed on the market, put into...
Rec. 25
This Regulation should support innovation, should respect freedom of...
Rec. 26
In order to introduce a proportionate and effective set of binding...
Rec. 27
While the risk-based approach is the basis for a proportionate and...
Rec. 28
Aside from the many beneficial uses of AI, it can also be misused and...
Rec. 29
AI-enabled manipulative techniques can be used to persuade persons to...
Rec. 30
Biometric categorisation systems that are based on natural persons’...
Rec. 31
AI systems providing social scoring of natural persons by public or...
Rec. 32
The use of AI systems for ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification...
Rec. 33
The use of those systems for the purpose of law enforcement should...
Rec. 34
In order to ensure that those systems are used in a responsible and...
Rec. 35
Each use of a ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in...
Rec. 36
In order to carry out their tasks in accordance with the requirements...
Rec. 37
Furthermore, it is appropriate to provide, within the exhaustive...
Rec. 38
The use of AI systems for real-time remote biometric identification...
Rec. 39
Any processing of biometric data and other personal data involved in...
Rec. 40
In accordance with Article 6a of Protocol No 21 on the position of...
Rec. 41
In accordance with Articles 2 and 2a of Protocol No 22 on the...
Rec. 42
In line with the presumption of innocence, natural persons in the...
Rec. 43
The placing on the market, the putting into service for that specific...
Rec. 44
There are serious concerns about the scientific basis of AI systems...
Rec. 45
Practices that are prohibited by Union law, including data protection...
Rec. 46
High-risk AI systems should only be placed on the Union market, put...
Rec. 47
AI systems could have an adverse impact on the health and safety of...
Rec. 48
The extent of the adverse impact caused by the AI system on the...
Rec. 49
As regards high-risk AI systems that are safety components of...
Rec. 50
As regards AI systems that are safety components of products, or...
Rec. 51
The classification of an AI system as high-risk pursuant to this...
Rec. 52
As regards stand-alone AI systems, namely high-risk AI systems other...
Rec. 53
It is also important to clarify that there may be specific cases in...
Rec. 54
As biometric data constitutes a special category of personal data, it...
Rec. 55
As regards the management and operation of critical infrastructure,...
Rec. 56
The deployment of AI systems in education is important to promote...
Rec. 57
AI systems used in employment, workers management and access to...
Rec. 58
Another area in which the use of AI systems deserves special...
Rec. 59
Given their role and responsibility, actions by law enforcement...
Rec. 60
AI systems used in migration, asylum and border control management...
Rec. 61
Certain AI systems intended for the administration of justice and...
Rec. 62
Without prejudice to the rules provided for in Regulation (EU)...
Rec. 63
The fact that an AI system is classified as a high-risk AI system...
Rec. 64
To mitigate the risks from high-risk AI systems placed on the market...
Rec. 65
The risk-management system should consist of a continuous, iterative...
Rec. 66
Requirements should apply to high-risk AI systems as regards risk...
Rec. 67
High-quality data and access to high-quality data plays a vital role...
Rec. 68
For the development and assessment of high-risk AI systems, certain...
Rec. 69
The right to privacy and to protection of personal data must be...
Rec. 70
In order to protect the right of others from the discrimination that...
Rec. 71
Having comprehensible information on how high-risk AI systems have...
Rec. 72
To address concerns related to opacity and complexity of certain AI...
Rec. 73
High-risk AI systems should be designed and developed in such a way...
Rec. 74
High-risk AI systems should perform consistently throughout their...
Rec. 75
Technical robustness is a key requirement for high-risk AI systems....
Rec. 76
Cybersecurity plays a crucial role in ensuring that AI systems are...
Rec. 77
Without prejudice to the requirements related to robustness and...
Rec. 78
The conformity assessment procedure provided by this Regulation...
Rec. 79
It is appropriate that a specific natural or legal person, defined as...
Rec. 80
As signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of...
Rec. 81
The provider should establish a sound quality management system,...
Rec. 82
To enable enforcement of this Regulation and create a level playing...
Rec. 83
In light of the nature and complexity of the value chain for AI...
Rec. 84
To ensure legal certainty, it is necessary to clarify that, under...
Rec. 85
General-purpose AI systems may be used as high-risk AI systems by...
Rec. 86
Where, under the conditions laid down in this Regulation, the...
Rec. 87
In addition, where a high-risk AI system that is a safety component...
Rec. 88
Along the AI value chain multiple parties often supply AI systems,...
Rec. 89
Third parties making accessible to the public tools, services,...
Rec. 90
The Commission could develop and recommend voluntary model...
Rec. 91
Given the nature of AI systems and the risks to safety and...
Rec. 92
This Regulation is without prejudice to obligations for employers to...
Rec. 93
Whilst risks related to AI systems can result from the way such...
Rec. 94
Any processing of biometric data involved in the use of AI systems...
Rec. 95
Without prejudice to applicable Union law, in particular Regulation...
Rec. 96
In order to efficiently ensure that fundamental rights are protected,...
Rec. 97
The notion of general-purpose AI models should be clearly defined and...
Rec. 98
Whereas the generality of a model could, inter alia, also be...
Rec. 99
Large generative AI models are a typical example for a...
Rec. 100
When a general-purpose AI model is integrated into or forms part of...
Rec. 101
Providers of general-purpose AI models have a particular role and...
Rec. 102
Software and data, including models, released under a free and...
Rec. 103
Free and open-source AI components covers the software and data,...
Rec. 104
The providers of general-purpose AI models that are released under a...
Rec. 105
General-purpose AI models, in particular large generative AI models,...
Rec. 106
Providers that place general-purpose AI models on the Union market...
Rec. 107
In order to increase transparency on the data that is used in the...
Rec. 108
With regard to the obligations imposed on providers of...
Rec. 109
Compliance with the obligations applicable to the providers of...
Rec. 110
General-purpose AI models could pose systemic risks which include,...
Rec. 111
It is appropriate to establish a methodology for the classification...
Rec. 112
It is also necessary to clarify a procedure for the classification of...
Rec. 113
If the Commission becomes aware of the fact that a general-purpose AI...
Rec. 114
The providers of general-purpose AI models presenting systemic risks...
Rec. 115
Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks should...
Rec. 116
The AI Office should encourage and facilitate the drawing up, review...
Rec. 117
The codes of practice should represent a central tool for the proper...
Rec. 118
This Regulation regulates AI systems and AI models by imposing...
Rec. 119
Considering the quick pace of innovation and the technological...
Rec. 120
Furthermore, obligations placed on providers and deployers of certain...
Rec. 121
Standardisation should play a key role to provide technical solutions...
Rec. 122
It is appropriate that, without prejudice to the use of harmonised...
Rec. 123
In order to ensure a high level of trustworthiness of high-risk AI...
Rec. 124
It is appropriate that, in order to minimise the burden on operators...
Rec. 125
Given the complexity of high-risk AI systems and the risks that are...
Rec. 126
In order to carry out third-party conformity assessments when so...
Rec. 127
In line with Union commitments under the World Trade Organization...
Rec. 128
In line with the commonly established notion of substantial...
Rec. 129
High-risk AI systems should bear the CE marking to indicate their...
Rec. 130
Under certain conditions, rapid availability of innovative...
Rec. 131
In order to facilitate the work of the Commission and the Member...
Rec. 132
Certain AI systems intended to interact with natural persons or to...
Rec. 133
A variety of AI systems can generate large quantities of synthetic...
Rec. 134
Further to the technical solutions employed by the providers of the...
Rec. 135
Without prejudice to the mandatory nature and full applicability of...
Rec. 136
The obligations placed on providers and deployers of certain AI...
Rec. 137
Compliance with the transparency obligations for the AI systems...
Rec. 138
AI is a rapidly developing family of technologies that requires...
Rec. 139
The objectives of the AI regulatory sandboxes should be to foster AI...
Rec. 140
This Regulation should provide the legal basis for the providers and...
Rec. 141
In order to accelerate the process of development and the placing on...
Rec. 142
To ensure that AI leads to socially and environmentally beneficial...
Rec. 143
In order to promote and protect innovation, it is important that the...
Rec. 144
In order to promote and protect innovation, the AI-on-demand...
Rec. 145
In order to minimise the risks to implementation resulting from lack...
Rec. 146
Moreover, in light of the very small size of some operators and in...
Rec. 147
It is appropriate that the Commission facilitates, to the extent...
Rec. 148
This Regulation should establish a governance framework that both...
Rec. 149
In order to facilitate a smooth, effective and harmonised...
Rec. 150
With a view to ensuring the involvement of stakeholders in the...
Rec. 151
To support the implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, in...
Rec. 152
In order to support adequate enforcement as regards AI systems and...
Rec. 153
Member States hold a key role in the application and enforcement of...
Rec. 154
The national competent authorities should exercise their powers...
Rec. 155
In order to ensure that providers of high-risk AI systems can take...
Rec. 156
In order to ensure an appropriate and effective enforcement of the...
Rec. 157
This Regulation is without prejudice to the competences, tasks,...
Rec. 158
Union financial services law includes internal governance and...
Rec. 159
Each market surveillance authority for high-risk AI systems in the...
Rec. 160
The market surveillance authorities and the Commission should be able...
Rec. 161
It is necessary to clarify the responsibilities and competences at...
Rec. 162
To make best use of the centralised Union expertise and synergies at...
Rec. 163
With a view to complementing the governance systems for...
Rec. 164
The AI Office should be able to take the necessary actions to monitor...
Rec. 165
The development of AI systems other than high-risk AI systems in...
Rec. 166
It is important that AI systems related to products that are not...
Rec. 167
In order to ensure trustful and constructive cooperation of competent...
Rec. 168
Compliance with this Regulation should be enforceable by means of the...
Rec. 169
Compliance with the obligations on providers of general-purpose AI...
Rec. 170
Union and national law already provide effective remedies to natural...
Rec. 171
Affected persons should have the right to obtain an explanation where...
Rec. 172
Persons acting as whistleblowers on the infringements of this...
Rec. 173
In order to ensure that the regulatory framework can be adapted where...
Rec. 174
Given the rapid technological developments and the technical...
Rec. 175
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this...
Rec. 176
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to improve the...
Rec. 177
In order to ensure legal certainty, ensure an appropriate adaptation...
Rec. 178
Providers of high-risk AI systems are encouraged to start to comply,...
Rec. 179
This Regulation should apply from 2 August 2026. However, taking into...
Rec. 180
The European Data Protection Supervisor and the European Data...

Need to comply with AI Act?

Our DPO and CISO team supports over 80 Luxembourg organisations. Free diagnosis, quote within 48h.

Request a diagnosis →